Frostgrave rules discussion

Including Ghost Archipelago, Rangers of Shadow Deep and Stargrave

Re: Frostgrave rules discussion

Postby Darkson (Simon) » Tue Apr 12, 2016 2:13 pm

Joe's musings on XP

http://therenaissancetroll.blogspot.co. ... oints.html

Frostgrave: Let’s Talk Experience Points

Frostgrave has been out for about nine months now, and in that time it has received more ‘play testing’ than I could have ever dreamed. Thousands of games have been played, and I’ve done my best to read, watch, and analyse as many as possible. From that, I am confident in saying that there is nothing in the game that is ‘broken’, that is, there is nothing that makes the game unplayable. However, I do believe there is plenty of room for improvement.

Probably the most controversial aspect of the game system is experience points. There was a lot of shouting about them right after release, and I suspect it is the most commonly house-ruled element of the game. That’s wonderful. I love house rules, and it is great that people like the rest of the system enough to spend the time modifying the game to suit their needs. That said, as a rules-writer, it would be better if I could come up with an official system that kept game balance while making the vast majority of players happy.

I am now beginning that process, and I’m asking for feedback! So please comment below.

Currently there are four main ways for wizards to earn experience points in Frostgrave, and these are my thoughts on them.

1. Killing Stuff

This is the main point of controversy. Since wizards only receive xps for stuff they kill directly, it stands to reason that wizards who are better at killing things will receive more xps. There is some internal balance to this, but perhaps not enough. If I were writing the game now, I would definitely lower the killing stuff xp rewards. In fact, I would probably take it all the way down to a flat 25xp for killing a wizard, apprentice, or soldier. I know there are some people who have done away with kill rewards altogether.

In most of the scenarios in The Thaw of the Lich Lord campaign, wizards are given xps for all servants of the Lich Lord killed by anyone in their warband. Although this doesn’t make strict sense, I wonder if players would prefer this system where the reward is just for the kills and regardless of who exactly does the killing?

2. Treasure

When working on the game, I don’t think I fully grasped how the recovery of treasure in a game was a double reward. First you get the xps and then you also get the treasure. I don’t think this is a major issue, and since grabbing treasure is still the point of the standard game, I wouldn’t want to change anything too drastically. I would probably take treasure recovery down to 35xp. This would mean in a tie game, where each player gets 3 treasures, they would each gain a level. Or, if a player sweeps the board, they still only gain two levels instead of three from treasure.

3. Spell Casting

If other xp rewards are going to go down, this is the most logical one to put up. When I first wrote the game, the plan was to give 25xp for each different spell successfully cast by a wizard or apprentice during a game. I can’t remember why I changed it, and I have always been slightly disappointed that I did. This system would give more reward to wizards who used a variety of spells during a game, which is more in keeping with the theme. It also means that wizards that had a bad spell casting game and only got off one or two spells would still get a descent xp return.

4. Scenario Goals

While not used in a ‘standard game’, I think most people generally play scenarios. I think most people will agree that xp rewards for specific scenario events (such as drinking from the Well of Dreams and Sorrows) add a lot to the game. However, the more scenario rewards that are available, the less xps should be gained from the above three sources. In a future supplement, I am planning on introducing a table of ‘subplots’ that players can roll on before the game to generate scenario rewards, thus turning even standard games into more specific scenarios. So, it might be a good thing if xps from killing, treasure, and spell casting actually go down.

5. Misc

There are a few other ways to gain xps. The most obvious is the Absorb Knowledge spell. This spell exists partly to offset the advantage of killy wizards. In retrospect, I think I should have made its casting cost a bit higher, probably a 10, but I don’t think it is a major issue. I suspect, even with all of the possible modifications above, it would still not be a major issue. Yhere are a few other ways to gain bonus xps. I think these can be fun, but I don’t want too many of them out there as combined they could get out of hand.

So, those are my thoughts on experience points at the moment. Now, I really want to hear what you, the players think. I don’t know when, if ever, I will make an official change to the rules, but if I do, I want to make sure they are ones that both I, and the vast majority of players, are happy with.
Send help - buried under my lead mountain!
User avatar
Darkson (Simon)
Archduke Pumpkin of ARBBL
 
Posts: 4712
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 3:34 pm

Re: Frostgrave rules discussion

Postby Darkson (Simon) » Tue Apr 12, 2016 2:27 pm

And my thoughts (which I can't post to his blog as requested, as I don't seem to be able to reply to any blog!):


1. Reducing the XP for kills I agree with. If you decide to make it for any kill by anyone within the warband I think it should be reduced further, else you risk to many levels being earned (especially if there are rats or scenarios where there are lots of "repeating" wandering monsters).

2. If you reduce kill XP I think leaving the treasure XP alone would be fine, as it would encourage getting the treasure off. I would remove the rule about gaining any treasure left on the board if you wipe out the opposing warband.

3. I like that, though I think you should still get XP for casting the same spell more than once (so 25Xp for the first time, 10XP for subsequent). A player shouldn't feel they have to cast a spell that has no tactical use at that time, just because they need the XP.

4. Like that idea.

5. Agreed.



Another thought, not directly hinted at in Joe's post, is that perhaps the XP needed per level could be increased. Say levels 1-10 stay at 100XP, but 11-20 needs 200XP, 21-30 needs 300xp and so on. Would slow the rate on which wizards grow, meaning that even if one player is winning more, they're not going to grow beyond the point of others being able to play them.
Send help - buried under my lead mountain!
User avatar
Darkson (Simon)
Archduke Pumpkin of ARBBL
 
Posts: 4712
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 3:34 pm

Previous

Return to Frostgrave

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

cron